Is illegal hunting now in NETCU’s sights and therefore a serious crime?

Since we pointed out that NETCU were biased by posting a story about SPEAK and the Advertising Standards Authority which was irrelevant for a police website, they have now posted something concerning the Countryside Alliance losing their appeal in the High Court placing this before the SPEAK article no doubt to hide the fact that they are indeed abusing their powers.

This is a sad attempt to hide their tracks.

However, NETCU are a group of police officers who are supposed to deal with “extremists”.

Does this mean that they regard the Countryside Alliance as extreme? Will those hunt supporters who attack, maim and kill hunt saboteurs actually be prosecuted and investigated properly?

Is illegal hunting now in NETCU’s sights and therefore a serious crime? NETCU do actually have one CA picture on their site so maybe. Why not write to NETCU via their website and ask them?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: